In other news

In May 2010, FAU’s Division of Student Affairs fired all of the university’s student media outlet advisers. The abrupt jettison made headlines across the county, but everyone from the then-student media director (who quit 12 months after she started) to the division head himself insisted the move was part of a “restructuring” designed to “move student media forward.”

Since then, Student Affairs’ actions have disproved their words.

By “restructuring” they meant “destructuring,” as fewer student media outlets have advisers today. And by “moving student media forward” they meant, most recently, allowing the student body president to unilaterally appoint a plagiarizer as leader of the TV outlet after he used TV outlet footage, FAU equipment, and FAU’s name and logo to help him land a gig with Playboy.

AJ Jordat

The public Facebook photo of the new manager of FAU's student-run TV station. Screenshot: Taken Sept. 14, 2011

Owl TV, FAU’s student-run TV station, was among the outlets that lost their adviser in May 2010 — and it’s still awaiting a new one. In the absence of an adviser…

Presidential behavior

Owl TV has gone through at least half a dozen station managers in the past year (instead of one every six months).

At least two quit before their terms ended. At least two were only interim to begin with. One was deemed ineligible after the selection committee voted on him and he had started the job. And last month, two were forced out for unclear reasons. (They declined to comment on the record, but what I know of their side of the story doesn’t match the Office of Student Media’s side.)

When our new student media director, Michael Gaede, deemed those last two outlet heads allegedly unfit to continue in their positions, Gaede had been on the job for less than two months. So, he told me, he consulted Student Body President Ayden Maher, who decided that he would appoint an interim station manager to run the problem outlet for the entire fall 2011 semester.

The thing is:

  1. It’s not in the rules. Maher says that Student Government statutes allow him to do so, and Gaede says he confirmed that with his boss, Associate Dean of Student Terry Mena, who is Student Affairs’ third-in-command. But the statutes posted on SG’s own website only state that the student body president may appoint interim chief justices and interim elections chairs in certain situations: They do not address interim student media outlet heads.
  2. It’s not the norm. At FAU, student media outlet heads are chosen by a selection committee of at least five members, which include the student body president (or more often, his delegate — Maher has been in office for at least two sets of three selections but has never attended).
  3. It might be illegal. According to the Student Press Law Center, this depends on state employment laws and where the money for the outlet head comes from. “Alarm bells are ringing,” SPLC attorney Adam Goldstein told me last week. “A deviation from that [usual selection] practice looks shady, I have to say.” The SPLC is now looking into the matter.
  4. It’s a conflict of interest. Our student media outlets cover our Student Government; therefore, for the head of SG to appoint the outlet heads is a conflict of interest that would call all SG coverage into question.
  5. It wasn’t advertised well. One of Maher’s and Gaede’s defenses is that the appointee was the best candidate out of everyone who applied for the position anyway. But it’s easy to be the best candidate when few students apply because few knew the position was open. Besides a tweet and a Facebook update, I don’t know that Student Government, Student Affairs, or the Office of Student media advertised the position. Even the guy who got the job told me he wouldn’t have known it was available if someone hadn’t told him.

Playboy leadership

Because the appointment was a closed process, the only details I have are secondhand. The one confirmable fact is who got the position: Alberto “AJ” Jordat Jr.

Here’s what I can tell you about him:

He didn’t appear to want the job. Jordat worked for Owl TV in the past but wasn’t working for them in any capacity when he applied to run the outlet. Further, it wasn’t his first choice. Jordat applied for the station manager position after applying for Student Government’s elections chair position but not getting it.

He sees “nothing wrong” with a student leader representing the university in a Playboy contest. A few weeks before he was appointed, Jordat entered the 2011 Be A Playboy Producer For A Day Contest, sponsored by video-sharing website Dailymotion.

The thing is, he entered as AJ Jordat the FAU multimedia major, not AJ Jordat, some unaffiliated guy whose dream job is to work for Playboy.

In other words, rather than create a video specifically for the contest and entering it as if he had no affiliations to FAU, Jordat compiled existing Owl TV footage — which includes shots of Owl TV’s logo, Student Government’s logo, and FAU’s logo — and entered it with FAU’s name attached. (Click on the three links below for examples.)

“It’s relevant to what I do,” Jordat told me, explaining that he included his university and major so that Playboy would know who and what he is. “It’s not an FAU association.”

But regardless of why he did it, FAU’s name and logos are still all over the three videos that Jordat submitted to the Playboy contest.

AJ_Playboy video

Note the description below the video. Screenshot: Taken Sept. 14, 2011 (click to enlarge)

(Click here to view more screenshots from this video. NOTE: Some may not consider these images work-safe and/or child-safe.)

Pool_Foam video

All of the footage seen in this video was shot at FAU on-campus events. Screenshot: Taken Sept. 14, 2011 (click to enlarge)

(Click here to view more screenshots from this video. NOTE: Some may not consider these images work-safe and/or child-safe.)

Jenna_Larissa video

Note the description below the video. Screenshot: Taken Sept. 14, 2011 (click to enlarge)

(Click here to view more screenshots from this video. NOTE: Some may not consider these images work-safe and/or child-safe.)

FAU’s name is also all over the dozens of public tweets that Jordat has made in order to promote his entries. (The contest winner will be selected based in part on how many hits his entries earn.) For example:

Screenshot: Taken Sept. 14, 2011 (click to enlarge)

(Click here for more such tweets.)

I doubt FAU’s Division of Marketing & Creative Services — which tightly controls the university brand — would approve of Jordat’s including logos in his entries.

“A key component of FAU’s brand, the University’s visual identity is the sum of all the images and visual impressions associated with FAU,” their web page reads.

And I doubt the head of FAU’s Division of Student Affairs, Charles Brown, would approve of Jordat’s entering the contest as an FAU student and remaining in it as a student leader.

“In terms of when you take on leadership roles, everything that you do represents the university. You don’t want to create a bad impression,” Brown told me when I was editor-in-chief. “I tell students that all the time.”

Plus, if the editor-in-chief entered the Playboy contest as Jordat did, Student Government leaders would be up in arms, and the heads of Student Affairs would call him into their offices for a series of lectures. The EIC even gets dirty looks when FAU and Playboy happen to make news together and the University Press simply reports that news.

When I reported in October that FAU may party Playboy-style, I caught more cold shoulders and upturned noses than usual in the halls of the Student Union. When we reported in our 2010 New Student Edition that FAU’s quirky former students include porn star Mary Carey, I (EIC at the time) heard all about how badly we made the university look.

What’s funny about that last example is that, based on his public tweets, Jordat actually knows, is friends with, and hangs out with Mary Carey — and has the photos to prove it.

He plagiarized. By entering the 2011 Playboy Producer For A Day Contest, you “agree to the terms and conditions,” as it says beneath the contest directions.

Those terms and conditions state that “all Videos: (a) must be a wholly original, audio-visual performance created by the Contest Entrant” and that “all elements used, incorporated into or otherwise appearing in a Video must be entirely original, created and performed by the Contest Entrant or be in the public domain.”

But Jordat was but one of at least nine people involved with the creation of the Owl TV footage that he compiled to create his contest entries, according to the original footage credits.

Jordat denies plagiarizing and told me that he edited all of the original Owl TV footage himself. “I put those [other] people’s names on the credits because they gave me creative input,” he said.

The thing is, by entering the contest, Jordat didn’t agree that he did all the editing himself: He agreed that he did all elements himself.

But Jordat admitted that he didn’t take the photographs in the first and third videos above and that he didn’t film the footage in the second video. And taking credit for someone else’s work is the essence of plagiarism.

No wonder

In Jordat’s defense, I’ve heard positive reviews of his efforts as station manager from the student media director. (Granted, Gaede supported the student body president’s closed appointment of Jordat.)

“I’m trying my best,” Jordat told me. “I’m trying my best with what I’ve got.”

And it’s not Jordat’s fault that what he’s got still doesn’t include an adviser.

Tags: , , , , , ,

6 Responses to “In other news”

  1. Michael Trimboli Says:

    Well, this really isn’t a surprise. I’m surprised it took this long for OwlTV to devolve as far down the chain as it has. Retrospectively, I should have seen this coming and did something about it. Why, oh why, didn’t I put the beast down when I had the chance.

    Now, I cannot say I have the brightest of histories with OwlTV. Having once been a station manager of that very same institution, I can say that the entire operation id doomed no matter how you slice it. I can honestly admit that I didn’t do the greatest job running that joint and I could have done much, much better. But, and I guess this is is part of learning those handy life lesson, I got put through the ringer with OwlTV. As have many others I know that has been through the wheels.

    As a manager, I didn’t do a great job. People will say I did, but I made for a decent face. As for a real leader, I was shit. At the time, I was not honestly fit to run a squad, especially one that was constantly insubordinate and didn’t take orders well. But I’m not trying to go for a sob story here. I just want to provide some insight into that organization that most don’t get from the outside in.

    AJ is right, in that he is only working with what he has. That being: No adviser (on part of Student Affairs), a decent amount of Money (with no direction on how to spend it), no staff, or at least no staff that’s willing to try, and no real goal or purpose.

    It’s just that simple.

    OwlTV is unrefined and uncoordinated. It has no purpose in life other than to exist. As such, it is used by other entities for their own purposes and goals and then tossed away like garbage.

    What AJ did however was wrong. AJ, you created smut. Good job. What you did, was use OwlTV (and FAU) resources for your own profit. That is wrong. Have some fucking pride in yourself and at least use what you had for something decent. You didn’t even do it well for Christ’s sake. You used it for smut. Come on man. You can do better than that. You kind of pulled a John Edwards. Just sayin’.

    Anyway, onto the interesting stuff.

    Something you must understand about OwlTV is that the station is and always has been a glorified PR machine for the University. Not a word that comes out of that unit has ever, or probably will ever criticize the officials at FAU in any way. Before taking office, I was kindly told by a former boss that I should never, unlike the University Press, attack or criticize the University. When asked why, I was told that it just wasn’t smart and shouldn’t be done. Conversation over.

    We, as members of OwlTV, did and acted upon the words and (not so) subtle suggestions of those handing us our paychecks.

    Like I said before, OwlTV has never had any direction. The station has been taken so many different directions, it never had any real purpose. Anyone trying to give it purpose was met with vitriolic hatred because that new idea shattered the old-world thinking of using the place for what it really was, a resource farm. OwlTV was used by more students than an IRT-based whore.

    The higher ups didn’t understand, they just figured the station could be used as a tool of the University. Students on the other hand, much in the same way AJ did, used the station as a means of boosting their career aspects.

    The station was started as a means of teaching the more technical aspect of the media world to students. That same world that the University didn’t and still doesn’t inform students about.

    What it has devolved however, is a “My First Video Camera” tutorial run for anyone with half a brain.

    Yes, come, stop on by. Use our resources, but never contribute anything to the cause. You want something? Fine, take it. We want something, maybe Work some extra hours? Nah, I’ve got (whatever) to do this weekend. Go fuck yourself.

    In addition, there was never any accountability at OwlTV. No one cared enough. Students didn’t care if they broke something or misplaced an expensive piece of equipment. It wasn’t their money, why should they care? We even had an expensive piece of equipment stolen right out from under our noses and did we do anything? We tried, but not a damn thing came of it.

    What that station needs is something I should have done when I ran the place. Someone needs to hit the reset button and re-create OWlTV with a purpose. Something meaningful, like journalism. I should have partnered with the University Press at the time, but I didn’t.

    I guess Hind sight is 20/20.

  2. Gilbert Says:

    Mike, don’t became a newspaper writer and please retake ENC 1101.

  3. Sam Anderson Says:

    Where can I get the full length videos? These are awesome. Going to watch owl-tv more often.

    • Karla Says:

      Sam,

      If you click on any of the three “Click here to view more screenshots from this video” links, you’ll find links to the videos at the top of the PDF.

      Enjoy,
      Karla

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.